Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Author’s Response
Brief Report
Case Report
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
History
Image
Images in Clinical Practice
Invited Commentary
JSSTD Symposium
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Media and News
Net Case
Net Consensus Statement
Net Educational Video for Residents
Net Image
Net Images
Net Letter
Net Quiz in Dermatology
Obituary
Original Article
Quiz in Dermatology
Resident’s Page
Review Article
Study Letter
Study Letter Case Series
Symposium
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Author’s Response
Brief Report
Case Report
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
History
Image
Images in Clinical Practice
Invited Commentary
JSSTD Symposium
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Media and News
Net Case
Net Consensus Statement
Net Educational Video for Residents
Net Image
Net Images
Net Letter
Net Quiz in Dermatology
Obituary
Original Article
Quiz in Dermatology
Resident’s Page
Review Article
Study Letter
Study Letter Case Series
Symposium
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Net Educational Video for Residents
5 (
2
); 120-122
doi:
10.25259/JSSTD_34_2022

Modified Ziehl–Neelsen staining for Mycobacterium leprae

Department of Dermatology, Government Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala, India.

*Corresponding author: Mary Vineetha, Associate Professor, Department of Dermatology, Government Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala, India. drmaryvineetha@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Mohan N, Sunil M, Akhil G, Priya SK, Vijayakumar V, Vineetha M, et al. Modified Ziehl–Neelsen staining for Mycobacterium leprae. J Skin Sex Transm Dis 2023;5:120-2.

Abstract

Modified Ziehl–Neelsen staining for Mycobacterium leprae is a time-tested technique in the evaluation of leprosy. The staining helps to classify clinical types of leprosy into those with low and high bacillary load. It is also useful in assessing the response to therapy, identifying defaulters, and differentiating relapse from late reversal reactions. In this net educational video, we demonstrate the technique of taking an ear lobe smear and performing the modified Ziehl–Neelsen staining for acid fast bacilli.

Keywords

Slit skin smear
Bacteriological index
Morphological index
Mycobacterium leprae
Acid fast bacilli

INTRODUCTION

Demonstration of Mycobacterium leprae (M. leprae) in slit skin smear (SSS) is a time-tested technique in the diagnosis, classification and management of leprosy. Demonstration of acid fast bacilli (AFB) in a skin smear is one of the three cardinal signs of leprosy.[1]

In 1963, Wade introduced the current technique of SSS.[2] Ziehl–Neelsen staining was introduced by Paul Ehrlich.[3] The staining method was modified by two doctors, the bacteriologist Franz Ziehl and the pathologist Friedrich Neelsen and was named after them.[4] Ziehl–Neelsen staining requires a primary stain (concentrated carbol fuchsin, basic fuchsin dissolved in phenol), a decolorizer, and a counter stain (Loeffler’s methylene blue). This technique is also called hot staining method as heat is used to drive primary stain into waxy cell wall of this difficult to stain organism.[4] Modified Ziehl–Neelsen staining is ideal for demonstration of M. leprae as the standard Ziehl–Neelsen method can easily decolorize its mycolic acid coating.[5]

INDICATIONS

  • All suspected cases of leprosy

  • To assess the treatment response in leprosy

  • To diagnose relapse in treated, smear positive leprosy cases

PROCEDURE

Materials needed

Spirit and cotton balls, gloves, glass slides, scalpel blade (Bard-Parker blade no:15), Bunsen burner or spirit lamp, glass rods, wash bottle, microscope, concentrated carbol fuchsin, Loeffler’s methylene blue, 5% sulfuric acid, or acid alcohol mixture (1% hydrochloric acid and 70% ethanol).

Collection of skin smears

  • Site is cleaned with spirit.

  • Skin is gripped between the thumb and the forefinger of the left hand to drive out blood.

  • A 5 mm long and a 3 mm deep incision is made with size 15, Bard-Parker blade (with pressure of finger maintained). Incision should be deep enough to include the dermis.

  • Turn the blade at right angles and scrape the wound several times in the same direction so that tissue fluid and pulp collect on one side of the blade.[5]

  • Smear the collected material on a glass slide in a circular motion from inside to outside to an approximate size of 8 mm.[6]

  • Two or more smears can be made on a glass slide.[5]

  • Fix the smear over a flame.

  • Record the body sites from which the smears are collected so that on follow-up, smears can be collected from the same sites.

  • Do not expose the slide with the smear to sunlight, dust, or extremes of temperature as it may interfere with the uptake of stain.

  • Long storage of fixed slides can also interfere with staining.

Modified Ziehl–Neelsen staining for M. leprae

  • Cover the slide with concentrated carbol fuchsin and apply heat beneath it, either with a Bunsen burner or a spirit lamp.

  • Heating should be sufficient to rise steam from all sides; avoid boiling.

  • Keep carbol fuchsin for 15 minutes.

  • Stain is tipped away and the slide is kept under gentle stream of water.

  • Pour acid-alcohol mixture or 5% sulfuric acid into the slide. Decolorize until the slide is faintly pink and then wash in running water.

  • Cover the slide with the counterstain (1% methylene blue) for 10 seconds.

  • Wash in running water and allow to dry [Video 1].

  • Examine the smear under the oil immersion lens of the microscope.[5]

Video 1:

Video 1:Modified Ziehl–Neelsen staining for Mycobacterium leprae. Video available online at: https://doi.org/10.25259/JSSTD_34_2022

INTERPRETATION OF THE RESULTS

M. leprae are seen as red rods against a blue background. Viable bacilli are seen as uniformly stained rods or solid bacilli having a length 4 times greater than the breadth. The dead bacilli stain irregularly and appear granular or fragmented. The bacilli may be seen singly, in small groups or closely packed bunches called globi.[7]

SSS is used to determine bacteriological index, (BI) morphological index (MI) and solid, fragmented and granular (SFG) index.[5]

SSS has a low sensitivity (10–50%); but a high (100%) specificity to diagnose leprosy.[8] Sensitivity is low at the tuberculoid end as the bacterial load is less. A negative smear does not exclude leprosy as at least 10,000 bacilli/g of tissue are needed to get a positive result.[9]

CONCLUSION

Modified Ziehl–Neelsen staining of skin smears is a test of diagnostic and therapeutic significance in leprosy, which does not require any sophisticated equipment. A proper knowledge of the same is essential to obtain accurate results.

Acknowledgment

The authors express sincere gratitude to Mr. Asokan V, Medical Photographer, and Mr Renjith Raj K, Lab Technician, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Kottayam.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Mary Vineetha and Dr. Kidangazhiathmana Ajithkumar are on the editorial board of the Journal.

Video available online at:

https://doi.org/10.25259/JSSTD_34_2022

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

References

  1. . WHO Technical Report Series No. 874 in Seventh Report In: Expert Committee on Leprosy. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; .
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Selection of sites for slit-skin smears. Lepr Rev. 1979;50:283-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Microscopy as a diagnostic tool in pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Mycobacteriol. 2015;4:1-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , . Acid Fast Stain Protocol Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; .
    [Google Scholar]
  5. . Diagnostic tests and histopathology In: , , eds. Joplings Handbook of Leprosy (6th ed). New Delhi: CBS Publishers; . p. :102.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , . Forgetting the cardinal sign is a cardinal sin: Slit-skin smear. Indian J Paediatr Dermatol. 2019;20:341-4.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. . Slit-skin smear in leprosy: Lest we forget it! Indian J Lepr. 2013;85:177-83.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. . Diagnosis and classification of leprosy. Lepr Rev. 2002;73:S17-26.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , et al. Diagnosing leprosy: Revisiting the role of the slit-skin smear with critical analysis of the applicability of polymerase chain reaction in diagnosis. Int J Dermatol. 2011;50:1522-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections