Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Guest Editorial
Images in Clinical Practice
Invited Commentary
JSSTD Symposium
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Media and News
Net Case
Net Consensus Statement
Net Educational Video for Residents
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz in Dermatology
Original Article
Quiz in Dermatology
Resident’s Page
Review Article
Study Letter
Study Letter Case Series
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Study Letter Case Series
1 (
); 24-25

Apremilast in psoriasis: A single centre treatment experience

Departments of Dermatology Venereology and Leprosy, Government Medical College, Alappuzha, Kerala, India
Departments of Dermatology Venereology and Leprosy, Government Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala, India
*Corresponding author: Dr. Radhika Varma, Department of Dermatology Venereology and Leprosy, Government Medical College, Alappuzha, Kerala, India.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Varma R, Sobhanakumari K, Athira S, Zacharia M. Apremilast in psoriasis: A single centre treatment experience. J Skin Sex Transm Dis 2019;1:24-5.


Apremilast is a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor that received FDA approval for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in 2014.[1] It offers a novel therapeutic option in patients with significant hepatic and metabolic derangements. The drug modulates the proinflammatory mediator release that plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis.[2] Apremilast not only alleviates the symptoms of the disease but also improves the quality of life of patients. Although no significant derangements in laboratory values were observed in any of the trials with the drug, limited data exist on the side effect frequency and adverse events in real-world practice.[3] Dose adjustment of the drug is advocated only in severe renal impairment.[2]

We report our experience on the effectiveness and tolerability of apremilast when given in both regular and lower dosages in psoriasis, in the Department of Dermatology, Government Medical College Alappuzha, during 10 months from March to December. The drug was given to a total of 13 patients. All had moderate-to-severe psoriasis assessed with both body surface area >10% and psoriasis area severity index (PASI) >10 as per the rule of ten. Data on adverse effects and dose adjustments were recorded during regular follow-up visits of the patients.

The mean age of patients and the mean duration of psoriasis were 41.46 ± 18.13 years and 6.23 ± 12.8 years, respectively. There were only two females (15.38%) and the rest were males (84.61%). Apremilast was given for unstable psoriasis in 3 (23.07%) patients, chronic plaque psoriasis in 9 (69.2%) patients, and for exfoliative psoriasis in 1 (7.6%) patient. The mean PASI of subjects was 35.98 ± 26.06. Apremilast was added as an adjunct to methotrexate and phototherapy in 10 (76.9%) patients as a substantial improvement as expected was not obtained in those patients. This drug was the only systemic agent prescribed in 3 (23.07%) patients as two of them had chronic liver disease and one had moderate pulmonary fibrosis contraindicating methotrexate.

The dosage of apremilast given for patients during the earlier and later phases of the study was different and decided based on our experience with the side effect profile noted from patients. The drug was given in a graded dosage as recommended starting at 10 mg OD up to a maximum of 60 mg for the first 8 (61.53%) patients whom we saw in the earlier part of the study. In five patients (38.4%), whom we saw in the later phase, the drug was given only up to a maximum dose of 45 mg daily (30 mg in the morning and 15 mg in the evening) and the patients were followed up.

We found that 75% (6/8) of the patients, who were given the full dosage of the drug, reported at least one adverse effect of the drug while 25% (2/8) patients tolerated the 60 mg dosage comfortably. Side effects were observed in an average of 7.33 ± 3.55 days after attaining the full dosage.

Diarrhea (66.66%) and headache (50%) were the most common side effects. Other events included abdominal pain (33.3%), nausea (33.33%), dizziness, and non-specific gastrointestinal symptoms (12.5% each). Apremilast causes diarrhea by activating chloride channel in the intestine leading to fluid secretion into the lumen. Headaches may be possibly due to the accumulation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate in susceptible patients.[4]

Of those who had adverse events, the drug was completely stopped in four (out of six) patients while in the other two subjects; the dose was reduced to 45 mg. The drug was restarted in those four patients in whom it was stopped after 2 months and slowly increased up to 45 mg. No appreciable modifications were made in the adjunct treatment received by all these patients during this period. Disease had a good and comparable remission in terms of reduced erythema, scaling and size of lesions, with excellent tolerability of drug at this dosage in all cases. Remission could also be maintained during the follow-up visits. Hence, the dose was not further increased to 60 mg.

In the next five patients who were given a lower dose of apremilast, an appreciable remission in disease without developing any significant side effects was observed. The response in two of the patients in this group who had apremilast as the only systemic agent was also very good. The maximum beneficial effect was observed in an average of 4.48 ± 0.96 weeks. Nonresponders to the drug were nil. The hemogram, liver, and the renal function tests of all patients were normal on follow-up visits.

In real practice, apremilast was withdrawn from patients in a greater proportion than that reported in clinical trials in the treatment of psoriasis due to many factors.[5,6] Tolerability of the drug at 60 mg dosage is always questionable.[5] Our observation adds onto the daily experience with the drug in a tertiary care center. The main limitations of our observations are the small sample of patients and the nonuniformity in drug/adjunct selection accepting the individualized treatment of physician for each patient in our center. Our vital observation despite the limitations is that clinical response of psoriasis to apremilast remains good or unaltered at a lower dosage recommending it as a good option to tackle the gastric side effects seen at higher dosages.

Studies analyzing the efficacy and adverse effects of apremilast at lower dose regimens are warranted to create a robust understanding of the drug characteristics.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


  1. . Otezla (Apremilast), an oral PDE-4 inhibitor, receives FDA approval for the treatment of patients with active psoriatic arthritis and plaque psoriasis. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2015;8:105-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Managing patients with psoriasis in the busy clinic: Practical tips for health care practitioners. J Cutan Med Surg. 2016;20:196-206.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. . Apremilast mechanism of action and application to psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Biochem Pharmacol. 2012;83:1583-90.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Apremilast for the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis: A single-centre real-life experience. Rheumatology. 2018;57:578-80.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. . Adverse events associated with apremilast use and withdrawal for psoriasis in a real-world setting. J Eur Acad Dermatol. 2018;32:e393-4.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Short-term reasons for withdrawal and adverse events associated with apremilast therapy for psoriasis in real-world practice compared to clinical trials: A multicenter retrospective study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;78:801-3.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views

PDF downloads
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
Show Sections