Translate this page into:
Assessment of knowledge and attitude toward leprosy among undergraduate medical students in north Kerala
*Corresponding author: V. S. Navya, Department of Dermatology, Malabar Medical College and Research Center, Kozhikode, Kerala, India. navya49@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Navya VS, Rajiv SV, George M, Nandakumar G, Dileep A. Assessment of knowledge and attitude toward leprosy among undergraduate medical students in north Kerala. J Skin Sex Transm Dis. 2025;7:94-100. doi: 10.25259/JSSTD_13_2025
Abstract
Objectives:
India accounts for the largest number of leprosy cases in the world, followed by Brazil and Indonesia. Inadequate knowledge about the disease and the disabilities associated is the root cause of stigma associated with leprosy. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential to prevent disabilities and reduce transmission. Medical students should have adequate knowledge about leprosy so that they can break the misconceptions in society and help to identify the cases early.
Materials and Methods:
A questionnaire-based descriptive cross-sectional study was done among undergraduate medical students from 1st year to final years in a medical college in North Kerala to assess their knowledge and attitude toward leprosy. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test were used to assess the association between knowledge and attitude. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results:
The study was done on 731 MBBS students among which 23% were males and 77% were females. 50.8% of students had good knowledge of leprosy and 64.8% of students had a positive attitude toward leprosy. Compared to the 1st year students, final-year students had a better knowledge and attitude toward the disease and this difference were statistically significant which indicates good training in undergraduate period.
Conclusion:
Knowledge and attitude toward leprosy among medical students were found to be favorable. Certain aspects, such as vaccines and treatment of leprosy need more emphasis.
Keywords
Attitude
Knowledge
Leprosy
Medical students
INTRODUCTION
Leprosy or Hansen’s disease, is an infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae. Droplet spread is the chief route of transmission.[1] It mainly affects the skin and peripheral nerves. Clinical manifestations depend on cell-mediated immunity of the host to M. leprae. Early diagnosis and prompt initiation of treatment are essential to prevent deformities that can have an impact on an individual’s social life.[2] Leprosy frequently leads to severe stigma, social exclusion, and psychological distress for sufferers and their families.[3]
India attained leprosy elimination (<1 case/10000 population) in December 2005. Although the number of cases determined by prevalence rate has gone down, the active transmission of infection remains unchanged as revealed by a steady level of annual new case detection rate. Due to the fear of discrimination, patients frequently hide their symptoms.[4] To achieve success in any control program of a disease, it is of prime importance that people in society should have knowledge about the signs and symptoms of the disease. There is a need for education in the community regarding early signs and symptoms of leprosy so that there is a rise in perception and awareness of the disease.[5] Leprosy is a strong mimicker, owing to its wide spectrum and various kinds of clinical presentations and occasionally confuses even the experienced doctors.[4] Since medical students are future doctors, it is important that they have adequate knowledge about the disease and can work to break the misconceptions existing in society, which helps in early diagnosis and prevent deformities. Previous studies conducted among medical and dental students revealed a fairly good knowledge of leprosy.[6,7]
The present study aims to assess the knowledge and attitude of undergraduate medical students toward leprosy and to compare the knowledge and attitude among 1st year and final-year students so that it also helps to understand the impact of undergraduate medical teaching. Similar studies have not been published in Kerala though studies from other states of India were published. This study aims to assess the knowledge and attitude in the State with highest literacy in India where preventive healthcare programs are strong.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in a tertiary care center in North Kerala. The study participants were undergraduate medical students of all years who consented to participate in the study. After obtaining institutional ethical committee clearance, all the students were given a questionnaire to complete along with a pro forma containing the demographic data of the students and an informed consent form. The questions were based on studies conducted previously under similar setting.[1,3,7] The questionnaire contained questions to assess the knowledge and attitude toward leprosy. There were a total of 40 questions out of which 34 questions were related to knowledge and 6 questions were related to attitude toward leprosy. Students were given a brief summary about the study. They were asked to fill the questionnaire with 30 minutes of distribution without discussing with peers. A score of 1 was given for correct response and score 0 for incorrect response. The total score for knowledge and attitude was evaluated separately and classified as poor and good.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software version 21. Numerical data were represented in frequency and percentages. Descriptive statistics were represented using mean and standard deviation. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test were used to assess the association between knowledge and attitude. The P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
RESULTS
A total of 731 MBBS students participated in the study. Among them 168 (23%) were males and 563 (77%] were females. Of this 308 (42.1%) were 1st-year students, 122 (16.7%] were 2nd-year students, 168 (23%) were 3rd-year students, and 133 (18.2%) were final-year students. Out of the 731 students, 346 (47.3%) were residing in urban areas and 385 (52.7%) in rural areas. About 628 (85.9%) did their schooling in Kerala, 49 (6.7%) outside Kerala and 54 (7.4%) outside India [Table 1]. Family history of leprosy was there in 4 (0.5%) students and only 103 (14.1%) students had seen a case of leprosy.
Variable | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Gender | ||
Male | 168 | 23.0 |
Female | 563 | 77.0 |
Year of study | ||
Phase 1 | 308 | 42.1 |
Phase 2 | 122 | 16.7 |
Phase 3 part 1 | 168 | 23.0 |
Phase 3 part 2 | 133 | 18.2 |
Residence | ||
Urban | 346 | 47.3 |
Rural | 385 | 52.7 |
Place of schooling | ||
Kerala | 628 | 85.9 |
Outside Kerala | 49 | 6.7 |
Outside India | 54 | 7.4 |
Out of the total 731 students, 371 (50.8%) had good knowledge in leprosy and 360 (49.2 %) had poor knowledge in leprosy [Tables 2 and 3]. Around 474 students (64.8%) had good attitude against leprosy and 257 (35.2%) had poor attitude towards leprosy [Table 4]. The mean knowledge score was 19.1, 18.6, 21.8, and 23.6 for 1st years, 2nd years, 3rd years, and final years, respectively. The mean attitude scores were 4, 3.8, 3.6, and 4.3 for 1st years, 2nd years, 3rd years, and final years, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between knowledge scores (P = 0.0001) and attitude scores (P = 0.0002) between 1st years and final years. There was no significant difference in knowledge and attitude score when compared with gender, place of residence, or place of schooling [Table 5].
Questions | Year of study | Total | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phase 1 | Phase 2 | Phase 3 part 1 | Phase 3 part 2 | ||
Synonym of leprosy | |||||
Incorrect answer | 73 | 31 | 21 | 3 | 128 |
Correct answer | 235 | 91 | 147 | 130 | 603 |
Cause of leprosy | |||||
Incorrect answer | 48 | 19 | 9 | 5 | 81 |
Correct answer | 260 | 103 | 159 | 128 | 650 |
Incubation period of leprosy | |||||
Incorrect answer | 176 | 79 | 129 | 87 | 471 |
Correct answer | 132 | 43 | 39 | 46 | 260 |
Most common mode of transmission of leprosy | |||||
Incorrect answer | 64 | 45 | 44 | 27 | 180 |
Correct answer | 244 | 77 | 124 | 106 | 551 |
Characteristic hallmark of the cutaneous lesions | |||||
Incorrect answer | 139 | 60 | 50 | 13 | 262 |
Correct answer | 169 | 62 | 118 | 120 | 469 |
Cardinal sign of leprosy | |||||
Incorrect answer | 199 | 79 | 65 | 33 | 376 |
Correct answer | 109 | 43 | 103 | 100 | 355 |
Clinical features of leprosy | |||||
Incorrect answer | 278 | 112 | 150 | 106 | 646 |
Correct answer | 30 | 10 | 18 | 27 | 85 |
Chiefly involved structure in leprosy | |||||
Incorrect answer | 48 | 14 | 3 | 5 | 70 |
Correct answer | 260 | 108 | 165 | 128 | 661 |
Which is the severe type of leprosy? | |||||
Incorrect answer | 169 | 49 | 33 | 27 | 278 |
Correct answer | 139 | 73 | 135 | 106 | 453 |
Most frequently affected nerve | |||||
Incorrect answer | 191 | 73 | 86 | 75 | 425 |
Correct answer | 117 | 49 | 82 | 58 | 306 |
Indication for systemic steroid in leprosy | |||||
Incorrect answer | 171 | 81 | 111 | 76 | 439 |
Correct answer | 137 | 41 | 57 | 57 | 292 |
Most contagious type of leprosy | |||||
Incorrect answer | 144 | 66 | 82 | 64 | 356 |
Correct answer | 164 | 56 | 86 | 69 | 375 |
Diagnostic test in leprosy | |||||
Incorrect answer | 181 | 68 | 24 | 20 | 293 |
Correct answer | 127 | 54 | 144 | 113 | 438 |
Constituents of multidrug therapy | |||||
Incorrect answer | 178 | 74 | 51 | 29 | 332 |
Correct answer | 130 | 48 | 117 | 104 | 399 |
Duration of PB MDT | |||||
Incorrect answer | 146 | 55 | 57 | 50 | 308 |
Correct answer | 162 | 67 | 111 | 83 | 423 |
PB: Paucibacillary, MDT: Multi drug therapy
Questions | Year of study | Total | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phase 1 | Phase 2 | Phase 3 part 1 | Phase 3 part 2 | ||
Duration of MB MDT | |||||
Incorrect answer | 153 | 61 | 65 | 57 | 336 |
Correct answer | 155 | 61 | 103 | 76 | 395 |
Nation with highest leprosy burden | |||||
Incorrect answer | 150 | 71 | 104 | 62 | 387 |
Correct answer | 158 | 51 | 64 | 71 | 344 |
Cause of deformities in leprosy occur mainly due to damage of which structure? | |||||
Incorrect answer | 41 | 20 | 4 | 3 | 68 |
Correct answer | 267 | 102 | 164 | 130 | 663 |
Which of the following is not a deformity of leprosy? | |||||
Incorrect answer | 239 | 86 | 96 | 73 | 494 |
Correct answer | 69 | 36 | 72 | 60 | 237 |
Leprosy patients need not be confined because | |||||
Incorrect answer | 205 | 86 | 119 | 83 | 493 |
Correct answer | 103 | 36 | 49 | 50 | 238 |
Can leprosy spread by tattooing? | |||||
Incorrect answer | 164 | 63 | 83 | 62 | 372 |
Correct answer | 144 | 59 | 85 | 71 | 359 |
Should the close contacts of leprosy patients be examined? | |||||
Incorrect answer | 58 | 18 | 20 | 6 | 102 |
Correct answer | 250 | 104 | 148 | 127 | 629 |
Are there various forms of leprosy? | |||||
Incorrect answer | 28 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 46 |
Correct answer | 280 | 111 | 164 | 130 | 685 |
Is leprosy transmittable from parents to children? | |||||
Incorrect answer | 188 | 72 | 98 | 78 | 436 |
Correct answer | 120 | 50 | 70 | 55 | 295 |
Safety of MDT during pregnancy and lactation | |||||
Incorrect answer | 222 | 83 | 98 | 60 | 463 |
Correct answer | 86 | 39 | 70 | 73 | 268 |
Availability of MDT free of charge to the patients in India | |||||
Incorrect answer | 98 | 53 | 42 | 16 | 209 |
Correct answer | 210 | 69 | 126 | 117 | 522 |
Availability of MDT in private sector | |||||
Incorrect answer | 76 | 40 | 58 | 47 | 221 |
Correct answer | 232 | 82 | 110 | 86 | 510 |
Availability of vaccine against leprosy | |||||
Incorrect answer | 94 | 57 | 100 | 87 | 338 |
Correct answer | 214 | 65 | 68 | 46 | 393 |
Is leprosy a public health problem in India? | |||||
Incorrect answer | 71 | 26 | 32 | 15 | 144 |
Correct answer | 237 | 96 | 136 | 118 | 587 |
Awareness about National Leprosy Elimination Programme | |||||
Incorrect answer | 174 | 48 | 31 | 4 | 257 |
Correct answer | 134 | 74 | 137 | 129 | 474 |
Is leprosy eradicated from India? | |||||
Incorrect answer | 93 | 46 | 31 | 27 | 197 |
Correct answer | 215 | 76 | 137 | 106 | 534 |
Awareness about “Aswamedham” campaign initiated by Govt. of Kerala | |||||
Incorrect answer | 181 | 65 | 92 | 39 | 377 |
Correct answer | 127 | 57 | 76 | 94 | 354 |
Is leprosy a curable disease? | |||||
Incorrect answer | 57 | 35 | 37 | 28 | 157 |
Correct answer | 251 | 87 | 131 | 105 | 574 |
Do all patients with leprosy have deformities? | |||||
Incorrect answer | 88 | 34 | 26 | 16 | 164 |
Correct answer | 220 | 88 | 142 | 117 | 567 |
MB: Multibacillary, MDT: Multi drug therapy
Questions | Year | Total | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phase 1 | Phase 2 | Phase 3 part 1 | Phase 3 part 2 | ||
Are you afraid of leprosy? | |||||
Yes | 182 | 73 | 120 | 60 | 435 |
No | 126 | 49 | 48 | 73 | 296 |
Is it ok to use the term Leper? | |||||
Yes | 116 | 28 | 43 | 32 | 219 |
No | 192 | 94 | 125 | 101 | 512 |
Is it necessary to isolate a leprosy patient during treatment? | |||||
Yes | 136 | 71 | 98 | 66 | 371 |
No | 172 | 51 | 70 | 67 | 360 |
Is it ok to touch a leprosy patient? | |||||
Yes | 226 | 76 | 94 | 104 | 500 |
No | 82 | 46 | 74 | 29 | 231 |
Is it acceptable for you to treat a leprosy patient? | |||||
Yes | 289 | 108 | 154 | 126 | 677 |
No | 19 | 14 | 14 | 7 | 54 |
Are you willing to share workplace with leprosy patients? | |||||
Yes | 232 | 90 | 120 | 109 | 551 |
No | 76 | 32 | 48 | 24 | 180 |
n | Mean | Standard deviation | F-value | P-value | Sig. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge | ||||||
Phase 1 | 308 | 19.114 | 3.9397 | 59.662 | 0.0001 | <0.05, sig |
Phase 2 | 122 | 18.590 | 3.9891 | |||
Phase 3 part 1 | 168 | 21.762 | 3.4489 | |||
Phase 3 part 2 | 133 | 23.579 | 3.6249 | |||
Attitude | ||||||
Phase 1 | 308 | 4.02 | 1.325 | 7.936 | 0.0002 | <0.05, sig |
Phase 2 | 122 | 3.84 | 1.338 | |||
Phase 3 part 1 | 168 | 3.64 | 1.351 | |||
Phase 3 part 2 | 133 | 4.36 | 1.275 |
F-value: Fisher’s exact value, Sig.: Significance
DISCUSSION
This study was conducted to assess the knowledge and attitude of our medical students about leprosy. Out of the total 731 students who participated in the study, 77% were females and 23% were males. This was almost similar to Jain et al. study conducted among dental students.[7] When knowledge and attitude scores were compared with gender, no significant association was found similar to the previous study.[7] Place of residence and place of schooling had no association with knowledge and attitude score. In our study, 50.8% had good knowledge of leprosy. The mean knowledge score was 19.1 among 1st years, 18.6% among 2nd years, 21.8% among 3rd years, and 23.6% among final years. The difference between knowledge scores of 1st years and final years was statistically significant (P = 0.0001) similar to the previous study by Swapna et al.[1] This emphasizes the importance of undergraduate training in leprosy.
In our study, 98% of final years and 76% of 1st years correctly answered the synonym of leprosy. In a study by Leena and Priya among medical students, 98% of final years and 62% of 1st years gave the correct answer.[8] In a study by Sharma et al. among medical students in Haryana, 100% of final years had knowledge about this synonym.[9] Swapna et al. showed results similar to our study (97% of final years and 84% of 1st years).[1] In our study, 96% of final years and 84% of 1st years identified leprosy as a bacterial infection. This was in concordance with the previous studies.[1,3,8,9] The incubation period of leprosy was correctly answered by only 35% of final years and 43% of 1st years in our study, whereas in a study by Swapna et al., it was 66% among final years and 44% among 1st years.[1] The mode of transmission of leprosy was correctly answered by 79% of final years and 79% of 1st years in our study. In Leena and Priya study, it was 100% among final years and 74% among 1st years.[8] Regarding the clinical features of leprosy, final-year students had better knowledge compared to 1st years in our study similar to previous studies.[1,8]
The final-year students (85%) had a better knowledge about slit skin smear in leprosy compared to 1st years (41%). In Leena and Priya study, only 60% of final years and 54% of 1st years had knowledge about slit skin smear. Duration of paucibacillary treatment and multibacillary treatment was correctly answered by only 62% and 57% of final years, respectively, while among 1st years, the percentages are 52% and 50%, respectively. It was in contrast to Sharma et al. where 100% of final-year students had correct knowledge about MDT.[9] In a similar study in Punjab, though final years had a good knowledge and 1st years had poor knowledge regarding treatment of leprosy.[3] Availability of vaccine against leprosy was correctly answered by only 34% of final years and 69% of 1st years similar to Swapna et al. where 16% of final years and 72% of 1st years were aware about the vaccine.[1] Final-year students had better knowledge about deformities of leprosy compared to 1st years. This was in contrast to previous similar study.[1]
The final-year students had a better knowledge about national health programs compared to 1st years. 97% of final years and 43% of 1st-year students were aware about the National Leprosy Elimination Programme. In a similar study, 90.9% of final years had knowledge about NLEP.[1] However, in a study by Jain et al. among dental students, 70.3% of students did not know about the existence of NLEP.[7] 70% of final-year students in our study were aware about “Aswamedham” campaign initiated by the Government of Kerala. However, only 41% of 1st years had heard about this program. Public health-related awareness was better for final years compared to 1st years and better among our students compared to previous studies in other states.
On assessing the attitude toward leprosy patients, final years showed a more positive attitude compared to 1st years and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0002). There were 6 questions to assess the attitude. The mean attitude scores were 4.02, 3.84, 3.64, and 4.36 for 1st years, 2nd years, 3rd years, and final years, respectively. This was similar to the previous study.[1] 94% of final years and 93% of 1st years were willing to treat leprosy patients which shows their positive attitude. 82% of final years and 75% of 1st years were willing to share a workplace with leprosy patients. In a study by Jain et al. among dental students the attitude among students to leprosy improved with their year of training.[7] In a study conducted in West Bengal, 8.7% of medical interns denied sharing work workplace with leprosy patients and 46.6% of relatives of leprosy patients preferred to keep distance from leprosy cases.[10]
In a community-based study conducted in Maharashtra, 78.9% of subjects had good knowledge about leprosy and 68.5% had a favorable attitude toward leprosy patients.[11] A community-based study conducted in Fatehpur district in Uttar Pradesh using questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and focus group discussions among leprosy patients, their contacts, community members, and healthcare workers revealed a poor knowledge about leprosy and increased stigma and tendency to keep social distance from leprosy patients.[12] A community-based study conducted in Tamil Nadu to assess the knowledge, attitude, and health-seeking behavior among urban adults revealed inadequate knowledge and an unfavorable attitude toward leprosy. Among the subjects, only 54.7% had adequate knowledge and 23.3% had favorable attitude toward leprosy.[13] In a study on villagers in Ethiopia, 56.1% had good knowledge and 42.1% had positive attitude toward leprosy.[14]
Limitations
It is a single-center study. This study was based only on questionnaires and did not include focus group discussions or interviews. Several biases such as social desirability bias while assessing the attitude toward leprosy could have occurred as the study was purely based on a questionnaire. But anonymity was maintained in collecting data which would have reduced this bias.
CONCLUSION
This study showed that the knowledge and attitude of medical students on leprosy are favorable. Although the final-year students had superior knowledge and attitude toward leprosy, certain aspects such as treatment of leprosy and vaccines against leprosy need more training.
Acknowledgment:
We acknowledge the contribution of Mrs Drisya M, Biostatistician, for her contribution in analyzing the statistics of our study.
Ethical approval:
The research/study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Malabar Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, number MMCH&RC/IEC/2023/59, dated May 15, 2023.
Declaration of patient consent:
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate consent from the study participants.
Conflicts of interest:
Dr. G. Nandakumar is on the editorial board of the Journal.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The authors confirm that there was no use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.
References
- An assessment of knowledge and attitude towards leprosy among undergraduate medical students. Indian J Clin Exp Dermatol. 2019;5:68-74.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Leprosy: Review of the epidemiological, clinical, and etiopathogenic aspects-part 1. An Bras Dermatol. 2014;89:205-18.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knowledge, awareness, and attitude toward leprosy among undergraduate medical students in India. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2023;13:1691-4.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Elimination of leprosy in India: An analysis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2018;84:131-6.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knowledge of and attitudes to leprosy among patients and community members: A comparative study in Uttar Pradesh, India. Lepr Rev. 2006;77:62-8.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Assessment of knowledge and awareness about leprosy among medical college students in Mewat region of Haryana. Int J Clin Biomed Res. 2018;4:1-4.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Knowledge and attitude about leprosy among Indian dental students in Faridabad. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:ZC48-52.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- A study of Knowledge and attitude about leprosy among medical students. Indian J Lepr. 2017;89:91-7.
- [Google Scholar]
- Comparative study of knowledge and awareness about leprosy among medical college students pre and post state leprosy sensitisation program in Mewat, Haryana, India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2018;12:BC29-32.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Knowledge, attitude and practices regarding leprosy and its management among leprosy patients, their relatives and the medical interns: An institution based cross-sectional study. Indian J Lepr. 2022;94:117-40.
- [Google Scholar]
- Knowledge and attitude of Indian rural community towards leprosy after post elimination phase: A survey from Karad Block, India. Natl J Community Med. 2016;7:797-801.
- [Google Scholar]
- The role of perceptions and knowledge of leprosy in the elimination of leprosy: A baseline study in Fatehpur district, northern India. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13:e0007302.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knowledge, attitude, and health seeking behavior on leprosy among urban adults in Kancheepuram district of Tamil Nadu: A community-based cross-sectional study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021;10:1895-903.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knowledge of and attitude toward leprosy in a leprosy endemic district, Eastern Ethiopia: A community-based study. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020;13:1069-77.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]