Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Author’s Response
Brief Report
Case Report
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
History
Image
Images in Clinical Practice
Invited Commentary
JSSTD Symposium
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Media and News
Net Case
Net Consensus Statement
Net Educational Video for Residents
Net Image
Net Images
Net Letter
Net Quiz in Dermatology
Obituary
Original Article
Quiz in Dermatology
Resident’s Page
Review Article
Study Letter
Study Letter Case Series
Symposium
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Author’s Response
Brief Report
Case Report
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
History
Image
Images in Clinical Practice
Invited Commentary
JSSTD Symposium
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Media and News
Net Case
Net Consensus Statement
Net Educational Video for Residents
Net Image
Net Images
Net Letter
Net Quiz in Dermatology
Obituary
Original Article
Quiz in Dermatology
Resident’s Page
Review Article
Study Letter
Study Letter Case Series
Symposium
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
7 (
1
); 87-89
doi:
10.25259/JSSTD_73_2025

Cefoperazone-sulbactam-induced acute localized exanthematous pustulosis: A rare adverse drug reaction

Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Government Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala, India.

*Corresponding author: Divya Thomas, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Government Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala, India. divyaanuthomas@gmail.com.

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Thomas D, Benny B, Ajithkumar K, Sandra TD. Cefoperazone–sulbactam-induced acute localized exanthematous pustulosis: A rare adverse drug reaction. J Skin Sex Transm Dis. 2025;7:87-9. doi: 10.25259/JSSTD_73_2025

Abstract

Acute localized exanthematous pustulosis (ALEP) is a rare, localized form of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, commonly induced by antibiotics. We present a 28-year-old female who developed multiple sterile, non-follicular pustules on her face after receiving cefoperazone–sulbactam for a surgical site infection. The lesions appeared within 2 days of antibiotic initiation, without fever or systemic symptoms. Gram stain and potassium hydroxide examination were negative, ruling out infections. Based on the clinical presentation, rapid onset, and exclusion of other causes, a diagnosis of ALEP was made. Management involved discontinuation of the suspected antibiotics, saline compresses, and a short course of topical steroid-antibiotic therapy. The patient showed marked improvement within days. This case underscores the importance of recognizing ALEP in the differential diagnosis of acute pustular eruptions. Early identification and prompt drug withdrawal are essential for favorable outcomes and avoiding unnecessary interventions.

Keywords

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis
Acute localized exanthematous pustulosis
Sterile pustules

INTRODUCTION

Acute localized exanthematous pustulosis (ALEP) is an uncommon, localized variant of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), marked by the rapid appearance of sterile pustules on an edematous and erythematous base.[1] It is an adverse drug reaction, most frequently associated with antibiotics, particularly beta-lactams and macrolides. Although AGEP is well documented, ALEP remains underrecognized and may be misdiagnosed as other pustular dermatoses, such as impetigo, miliaria pustulosa, folliculitis, pustular psoriasis, or candidiasis.

We report a case of a young female who developed multiple clustered pustules on her face and ears following treatment with cefoperazone–sulbactam.

CASE REPORT

A 28-year-old female presented with multiple discrete and confluent pus-filled lesions on her face, accompanied by a burning sensation [Figures 1 and 2]. There were no episodes of fever, and no similar lesions were observed elsewhere on her body. She had been administered cefoperazonesulbactam and metronidazole injections for 2 days to treat a surgical site infection.

Frontal view showing multiple discrete and confluent pustules on an erythematous and edematous background, affecting the eyelids and sides of the nose.
Figure 1:
Frontal view showing multiple discrete and confluent pustules on an erythematous and edematous background, affecting the eyelids and sides of the nose.
Lateral view of the right side of the face depicting grouped pustules on an erythematous base, primarily involving the cheek, ala of the nose, and ear lobule.
Figure 2:
Lateral view of the right side of the face depicting grouped pustules on an erythematous base, primarily involving the cheek, ala of the nose, and ear lobule.

Examination revealed multiple non-follicular pustules on a red, edematous base primarily affecting her eyelids, nose, and ear lobes. The initial differential diagnoses included a localized form of AGEP, localized pustular psoriasis, candidiasis, miliaria pustulosa, and bullous impetigo.

Gram staining and potassium hydroxide examination were negative, ruling out impetigo and candidiasis. Miliaria pustulosa usually has a gradual onset and affects flexures and the trunk. However, in our case, the lesions were confined to the face and appeared suddenly after initiating antibiotics, making miliaria pustulosa an unlikely diagnosis. She had no family or personal history of psoriasis. Since she had received metronidazole after her cesarean section without experiencing any adverse reactions, a drug reaction to metronidazole was also unlikely. As the pustules were sterile and appeared within 2 days of initiating antibiotic therapy, a diagnosis of ALEP secondary to cefoperazone–sulbactam was made.

The antibiotics were discontinued, and a change in antibiotics was recommended. She was treated with saline compresses and a topical steroid-antibiotic cream for 5 days and showed a significant improvement at follow-up [Figure 3]. Since this was a localized form of a severe cutaneous drug reaction, we did not attempt rechallenge with cefoperazone–sulbactam to avoid the risk of a more serious response.

Post-treatment frontal view showing significant resolution of pustules and erythema after discontinuation of the suspected drugs and administration of topical corticosteroids.
Figure 3:
Post-treatment frontal view showing significant resolution of pustules and erythema after discontinuation of the suspected drugs and administration of topical corticosteroids.

DISCUSSION

ALEP is a localized variant of AGEP, a severe skin reaction that typically occurs shortly after drug administration. ALEP is marked by the development of 1-2 mm sterile pustules, typically developing within 3–5 days after initiation of the offending drug, and generally subsides quickly following its withdrawal.[2] Patients may experience fever, leukocytosis, itching, or a burning sensation. In our patient, pustules developed within 2 days of starting antibiotic therapy.

In over 80% of cases, ALEP is drug-induced, with antibiotics, particularly beta-lactams and macrolides, being the most common triggers.[3] However, it can also be caused by bacterial, viral, or parasitic infections.[4] Less than 30 cases of ALEP have been reported so far. The medications implicated in these cases include antibiotics like amoxicillin, ampicillin, amoxicillin–clavulanic acid, ceftibuten, cefoperazone– sulbactam, clindamycin, cotrimoxazole, fosfomycin, levofloxacin, piperacillin–tazobactam, and vancomycin; nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs like paracetamol, ibuprofen, diclofenac, and flurbiprofen; and others like allopurinol, docetaxel, sorafenib, lamotrigine, finasteride, and minoxidil (topical).[5] Recently, the Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission issued a notification identifying AGEP as a possible adverse drug reaction to metronidazole.[6] In this case, the patient had previously taken metronidazole without any adverse reaction; therefore, a reaction to metronidazole was ruled out.

The underlying mechanism is believed to be a type IV hypersensitivity reaction. After exposure to the drug, antigen-presenting cells present the antigen via major histocompatibility complex molecules, activating specific CD4 and CD8 T cells.[7] These cells proliferate and migrate to the skin, where CD8 T cells induce keratinocyte apoptosis through perforin/granzyme B and Fas ligand pathways, causing tissue damage and vesicle formation. In addition, the release of C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 8 (CXCL8), a strong neutrophilic cytokine, attracts neutrophils to the vesicles, leading to the formation of sterile pustules.[8]

The histological features of AGEP and ALEP include spongiform, subcorneal pustules, along with an edematous papillary dermis. Perivascular infiltrates consisting of neutrophils and a few eosinophils are observed, and necrotic keratinocytes along with leukocytoclastic vasculitis may also be present.[4]

ALEP is a self-resolving condition, and the main approach to treatment involves stopping the suspected medication, which typically leads to symptom relief within a few days. In cases of persistent pruritus and inflammation, supportive care with topical or oral corticosteroids may be considered. Stopping the medication arrested the progression of lesions in our patient. Topical steroids were administered for 5 days to manage the erythema and edema. Hopkins et al. described a case of ALEP triggered by lamotrigine, where rechallenging with the drug led to a widespread eruption, highlighting the critical need to avoid re-exposure to the offending medication in ALEP cases.[9]

CONCLUSION

ALEP is a rare and often underrecognized condition that can present as an acute pustular eruption, particularly in patients receiving antibiotics. This case underscores the importance of considering ALEP in the differential diagnosis of acute pustular eruptions, especially in the context of recent drug exposure. Effective treatment relies on early detection and immediate discontinuation of the suspected drug. Maintaining clinical awareness of ALEP ensures timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment, minimizing unnecessary interventions and patient discomfort.

Ethical approval:

Institutional review board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest:

Dr. Ajithkumar K is on the editorial board of the Journal.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , . Acute localized exanthematous pustulosis on the face. Ann Dermatol. 2011;23(Suppl 3):S368-70.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis: Report of five cases and systematic review of clinical and histopathological findings. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2014;149:281-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Localized pustulosis induced by betalactams. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2000;10:178-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , . Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP): A review and update. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73:843-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . Acute localized exanthematous pustulosis (ALEP): Review of literature with report of case caused by amoxicillinclavulanic acid. Dermatol Ther. 2017;7:563-70.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. . Monthly drug safety alerts: Analysis of adverse drug reactions from the PvPI database. . Report No. P.17019/03/2025-DSA. Ghaziabad: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; Available from: https://ipc.gov.in/images/Drug_Safety_Alert_September_2024_1.pdf. [Last accessed on 2025 March 28]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . Cross comparison of patch-test and lymphocyte proliferation responses in patients with a history of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Am J Dermatopathol. 2005;27:343-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Generalized pustular drug eruptions: Confirmation by in vitro tests. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 1998;10:36-41.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . Acute localized exanthematous pustulosis (ALEP) caused by lamotrigine. JAAD Case Reports. 2018;4:645-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections