Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Author’s Response
Brief Report
Case Report
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
History
Image
Images in Clinical Practice
Invited Commentary
JSSTD Symposium
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Media and News
Net Case
Net Consensus Statement
Net Educational Video for Residents
Net Image
Net Images
Net Letter
Net Quiz in Dermatology
Obituary
Original Article
Quiz in Dermatology
Resident’s Page
Review Article
Study Letter
Study Letter Case Series
Symposium
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Author’s Response
Brief Report
Case Report
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
History
Image
Images in Clinical Practice
Invited Commentary
JSSTD Symposium
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Media and News
Net Case
Net Consensus Statement
Net Educational Video for Residents
Net Image
Net Images
Net Letter
Net Quiz in Dermatology
Obituary
Original Article
Quiz in Dermatology
Resident’s Page
Review Article
Study Letter
Study Letter Case Series
Symposium
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
5 (
1
); 28-35
doi:
10.25259/JSSTD_84_2021

Patterns of infant dermatoses: An observational study from the dermatology outpatient clinic of a tertiary referral center

Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, Government Medical College, Kollam, Kerala, India.
Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, Government Medical College Alappuzha, Kerala, India.
Department of Paediatrics, Sree Avittam Thirunal Hospital, Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.

*Corresponding author: Vasanthiamma K. Devakumar, Department of Paediatrics, Sree Avittam Thirunal Hospital, Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. devakumarvk@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Mudang J, Samad KA, Devakumar VK, Ashok P, George AE. Patterns of infant dermatoses: An observational study from the dermatology outpatient clinic of a tertiary referral center. J Skin Sex Transm Dis 2023;5:28-35.

Abstract

Objectives:

To study the pattern of dermatoses among infants who attended the dermatology outpatient clinic of a tertiary referral center.

Materials and Methods:

We included 270 consecutive infants (children aged 1 year and below) with dermatoses who attended the outpatient clinic of the department of dermatology of our tertiary referral center. Using a preset proforma, we collected information on patient profile, evolution of dermatosis, and clinical features. The dermatoses observed were classified as transient and non-infective conditions, nevi and other developmental defects, genodermatoses, infections and infestations, inflammatory dermatoses, reactive dermatoses, and other miscellaneous conditions.

Results:

The study participants included 162 males (60%) and 108 females (40%). Fifty-three infants (53/270, 19.6%) were neonates. The most common dermatoses observed among the study participants were infections and infestations (86, 31.9%) followed by inflammatory dermatoses (83, 30.7%). Among the neonates, the common dermatoses observed were napkin dermatitis (14/53, 26.4%), transient neonatal pustular melanosis (6/53, 11.3%), and congenital melanocytic nevus (6/53, 11.3%). The common dermatoses observed among infants above 28 days were fungal infections (32/217, 14.7%), atopic dermatitis (23/217, 10.6%), miliaria (22/217, 10.1%) and infantile seborrheic dermatitis (21/217, 9.7%).

Limitations:

The study carried out in the outpatient clinic of the dermatology department of a tertiary referral center and the cross-sectional design were the major limitations.

Conclusion:

Fungal infection was the most frequently observed infection. Whether, this indicates an epidemiological shift in the prevalence of dermatophytosis in pediatric age group needs analysis in future multicenter studies. Napkin dermatitis and atopic dermatitis were the most common non-infective dermatoses in the neonatal and post-neonatal age groups, respectively.

Keywords

Infants
Dermatoses
Infections
Inflammatory dermatosis
Tertiary care center

INTRODUCTION

Dermatoses in infants (children below the age of 1 year) are a serious concern to parents and are common causes for consultations in pediatric age group.[1] Many of the nevi make their appearance in the first year of life. At times a cutaneous finding could be the marker of a more serious congenital disorder such as tuberous sclerosis or a primary immunodeficiency disease or an underlying neoplastic process.[2-4] Differentiating the physiological cutaneous changes of the newborn and the benign dermatoses of infancy from the dermatoses that require further evaluation and management is often a challenge to the clinician. An in-depth knowledge regarding the various dermatoses of infancy is of great importance in offering quality care to the baby.

We carried out a cross-sectional study to describe the clinical pattern of dermatoses observed in children aged 1 year and below.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Inclusion criteria

We included 270 consecutive infants (children aged 1 year and below) with dermatoses who attended the outpatient clinic of department of dermatology of our tertiary referral center from January 2019 to December 2019.[1] The sample size was calculated according to the formula n = Zα2pq/d2. The sample size calculated was 262 based on the frequency of infections (43%) noted in infants with dermatoses in a previous study (p = 43%, d = 6%).[5]

Exclusion criteria

We excluded patients whose parents/guardians were not willing to give consent for the study and infants who manifested only physiological cutaneous changes (neonatal erythema, lanugo, physiological desquamation, genital hyperpigmentation, vernix caseosa, axillary pigmentation, suckling pads, and vaginal bleeding).

Institutional ethics committee approved the study. We obtained written informed consent from the parents/the guardians of the infants.

Study participants were categorized as neonates (first 4 weeks of life) and those above 28 days.[6] Infants born at a gestational age of less than 37 weeks were considered pre-term babies, while those delivered at a gestational age of 37–42 weeks were categorized as term babies.[7] All the questions in a pre-set proforma were read to the parents of the study participants and the responses were recorded. We collected data on demography, history of the dermatoses, and associated family history. Investigation reports and previous medical reports were used for filling relevant parts of the proforma. A general examination followed by a detailed dermatological examination was carried out in individual study participant. Microscopic examination of skin scrapings in potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution, Gram stain, pus culture and sensitivity, and skin biopsy were performed when indicated. Dermatosis was diagnosed in individual patient by the first author (dermatology resident) with guidance from a qualified dermatologist (2nd author) and a pediatrician (3rd author), both having more than 10 years’ experience in respective specialities.

The dermatoses observed were classified as transient and non-infective conditions, nevi, and other developmental defects, genodermatoses, infections and infestations, inflammatory dermatoses, reactive dermatoses, and other miscellaneous conditions. A diagnosis of candidal intertrigo was made when hyphae/pseudohyphae were observed in KOH smear of skin scrapings. When infants presented with intertrigo and hyphae/pseudohyphae were not observed in KOH smear, then the diagnosis was kept as intertrigo and included under miscellaneous dermatoses.

Data were entered in Excel sheets and analyzed. The proportion of various dermatoses was reported as percentages.

RESULTS

Out of the 270 participants, 162 were males (60%) and 108 were females (40%). Fifty-three babies (19.6%) out of the total 270 infants were neonates (0–28 days) and 217 (80.4%) had completed the neonatal period.

Twenty-three infants (23/270, 8.5%) were pre-term and 247 infants (91.5%) were term babies.

The majority (261) of the infants had adequate birth weight (96.7%) and 3.3% (9/270) had a low birth weight of 2.5 kg or less. Two hundred and eight (77%) and 62 (23%) infants were born by normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section, respectively.

Mothers of 147 study participants (54.4%) had a history of illness during pregnancy. The common maternal conditions documented in the study were gestational diabetes (34/270, 12.6%), hypothyroidism (31/270, 11.5%), pregnancy induced hypertension (16/270, 5.9%), and atopy (14/270, 5.2%).

The most common dermatoses [Table 1] observed in the study participants were infections and infestations (86, 31.9%) [Table 2], followed by inflammatory dermatoses (83, 30.7%).

Table 1: Dermatoses observed in children aged 1 year and below attending a tertiary referral center.
Diagnosis Number of patients (% of total) n=270 (100)
Infections and infestations 86 (31.9)
Inflammatory dermatoses 83 (30.7)
Nevi and developmental defects 31 (11.5)
Transient, non-infective dermatoses 11 (4.1)
Reactive dermatoses 9 (3.3)
Genodermatoses 7 (2.6)
Miscellaneous dermatoses 43 (15.9)
Table 2: Infections and infestations in children aged 1 year and below attending a tertiary referral center.
Diagnosis Number of study participants Total n=270 (100%)
0–28 days n=53 (100%) 29 days–1 year n=217 (100%)
Fungal infections 0 (0) 32 (14.7) 32 (11.9)
Viral infections 2 (3.8) 20 (9.2) 22 (8.1)
Bacterial infections 5 (9.4) 11 (5.1) 16 (5.9)
Parasitic infestations 0 (0) 16 (7.4) 16 (5.9)

None of the neonates manifested any fungal or parasitic infestation, while fungal infections (32/217, 14.7%) contributed to majority of the infections in the post-neonatal period [Figure 1]. Bacterial infection was the predominant infection in the neonatal age group (5/53, 9.4%).

Annular plaque with central clearing and peripheral activity — Tinea corporis.
Figure 1:
Annular plaque with central clearing and peripheral activity — Tinea corporis.

The fungal infections observed in the study participants were pityriasis versicolor (18/270, 6.7%), candidal intertrigo (2/270, 0.7%), and dermatophytosis (12/270, 4.4%).

The viral infections noted included exanthematous rash (9/270, 3.3%), varicella (4/270, 1.5%), molluscum contagiosum (3/270, 1.1%), and hand, foot, and mouth disease (6/270, 2.2%). The two patients who manifested viral infections in the neonatal period had varicella (1/53, 1.9%) and molluscum contagiosum (1/53, 1.9%), respectively.

The bacterial infections noted were impetigo (5/270, 1.9%), periporitis (5/270, 1.9%), and staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome [6/270, 2.2%, Figure 2]. All the five bacterial infections seen in the neonatal period were staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome.

Epidermal peeling and perioral lesions-staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome.
Figure 2:
Epidermal peeling and perioral lesions-staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome.

The lone parasitic infestation noted in the study was scabies (16/270, 5.9%).

The inflammatory dermatoses observed were atopic dermatitis [23/270, 8.5%, Figure 3], infantile seborrheic dermatitis (21/270, 7.8%), napkin dermatitis (21/270, 7.8%), pityriasis alba (10/270, 3.7%), keratosis pilaris (3/270, 1.1%), nummular eczema, (2/270, 0.7%), urticaria (2/270, 0.7%), and allergic contact dermatitis (1/270, 0.4%). The only inflammatory dermatosis observed in the neonatal period was napkin dermatitis (14/53, 26.4%).

Facial dermatitis in an infant with atopic dermatitis.
Figure 3:
Facial dermatitis in an infant with atopic dermatitis.

The various nevi [Figure 4] observed in the study are shown in Table 3.

Velvety, pigmented lesion of congenital melanocytic nevus.
Figure 4:
Velvety, pigmented lesion of congenital melanocytic nevus.
Table 3: Nevi observed in children aged 1 year and below attending a tertiary referral center.
Clinical type Number of study participants Total n=270 (100%)
0–28 days n=53 (100%) 28 days–1 year n=217 (100%)
Congenital melanocytic nevi 6 (11.3) 3 (1.4) 9 (3.3)
Mongolian spots 1 (1.9) 5 (2.3) 6 (2.2)
Infantile hemangioma 0 (0) 5 (2.3) 5 (1.9)
Nevus flammeus 0 (0) 3 (1.4) 3 (1.1)
Nevus Simplex 2 (3.8) 1 (0.5) 3 (1.1)
Nevus depigmentosus 1 (1.9) 1 (0.5) 2 (0.7)
Nevus sebaceous 1 (1.9) 1 (0.5) 2 (0.7)
Verrucous epidermal nevus 1 (1.9) 0 (0) 1 (0.4)

The transient, non-infective dermatoses noted were transient neonatal pustular melanosis (6/270, 2.2%), erythema toxicum neonatorum (3/270, 1.1%), and Bohn’s nodule (2/270, 0.7%). Both patients who had Bohn’s nodule belonged to the post neonatal age group. The remaining nine patients (9/11, 81.8%) who manifested transient, non-infective dermatoses were neonates.

The only reactive dermatosis observed among study participants was papular urticaria which was observed in nine infants (9/270, 3.3%), all of whom were older than 28 days (9/217, 4.1%).

The genodermatoses were seen in seven infants (7/270, 2.6%) and included collodion baby [3/270, 1.1%, Figure 5], hypomelanosis of Ito [3/270, 1.1%, Figure 6], and linear and whorled nevoid hypermelanosis (1/270, 0.4%). All three neonates (3/53, 5.7%) who had genodermatoses were collodion babies.

Collodion baby during a follow up visit.
Figure 5:
Collodion baby during a follow up visit.
Streaks and patches of hypopigmentation — hypomelanosis of Ito.
Figure 6:
Streaks and patches of hypopigmentation — hypomelanosis of Ito.

Other dermatoses [Figure 7] observed in the study were classified as miscellaneous dermatoses (43/270, 15.9%) and are shown in Table 4.

Erythematous, scaly papules and plaques of psoriasis.
Figure 7:
Erythematous, scaly papules and plaques of psoriasis.
Table 4: Miscellaneous dermatoses observed among children aged 1 year and below attending a tertiary referral center.
Diagnosis Number of study participants Total number of study participants n=270 (100%)
0–28 days n=53 (100%) 29 days–1 year n=217 (100%)
Miliaria 0 (0) 22 (10.1) 22 (8.1)
Intertrigo 1 (1.9) 13 (6) 14 (5.2)
Psoriasis 0 (0) 2 (0.9) 2 (0.7)
Neonatal lupus erythematosus 0 (0) 1 (0.5) 1 (0.4)
Keloid 0 (0) 1 (0.5) 1 (0.4)
Stevens-Johnson’s syndrome — Toxic epidermal necrolysis 0 (0) 1 (0.5) 1 (0.4)
Vitiligo 0 (0) 1 (0.5) 1 (0.4)
Cutaneous mastocytosis 0 (0) 1 (0.5) 1 (0.4)

Among the neonates, the common dermatoses were napkin dermatitis (14/53, 26.4%), transient neonatal pustular melanosis (6/53, 11.3%), and congenital melanocytic nevus (6/53, 11.3%).

The common dermatoses observed among infants aged above 28 days were fungal infections (32/217, 14.7%), atopic dermatitis (23/217, 10.6%), miliaria (22/217, 10.1%), and infantile seborrheic dermatitis (21/217, 9.7%).

DISCUSSION

The first year of life is significant as far as the structural and functional maturation of skin is considered. The process of this maturation starts soon after birth and completes in the first year of life. The new born skin has a higher growth rate, immature sweat glands and hence a limited ability to sweat (particularly that of pre-term infants), reduced water holding capacity, a lower concentration of natural moisturizing factor and a higher skin pH compared to adult skin. The resident microbial community of new born skin differs from that of adults and evolves during the first year of life.[8] There are conflicting reports on the comparability of the new born and adult skin with respect to transepidermal water loss. Some studies say the transepidermal water loss in full-term newborn skin is comparable to that of adults; but others have reported a lower or higher value in infants.[8-10]

Information on dermatoses of clinical significance in infants is essential for distinguishing the pathological changes from the physiological changes.

Physiological conditions (65.3%) and infections (54.8%) predominated in the neonatal and post-neonatal period, respectively, in another study from a tertiary care center in Eastern India.[5] Current study was not designed to assess physiological skin changes of newborn since it was carried out in the outpatient clinic of the dermatology department. An accurate description of physiological skin changes in newborn would only be possible in studies that recruit participants from the newborn nursery. Hence, we used physiological skin changes as an exclusion criterion.

We noted napkin dermatitis (26.4%) to be the most common neonatal dermatosis, while infections (36.4%) predominated in the post-neonatal period. Diaper dermatitis is reported as the most common skin disorder of infancy in United States. Wetness of diaper area leads to disruption of skin barrier function and easier penetration of irritants. It is reported that Candida albicans was isolated from majority of infants with irritation of perennial area. A less frequent use of synthetic diapers could be the reason for the observed lower frequency (7/217, 3.2%) of dermatitis of the diaper area in the post-neonatal period in our study in comparison to Western literature.[11]

We noted a higher frequency of fungal infections (11.9%) among the study participants, followed by viral (8.1%) and bacterial infections (5.9%). This was contradictory to certain previous studies that observed a higher frequency of parasitic infestations and bacterial infections.[5,12,13] Samanta and Achar in their study conducted at a tertiary referral center noted parasitic infestations in 3.3% of neonates and 25.3% of infants older than 28 days.[5] All infants belonging to the post-neonatal age group who manifested parasitic infestation in their study had scabies.[5] We also found scabies as the only parasitic infestation among study participants. We found scabies in 7.4% of infants older than 28 days, while none of the neonates had parasitic infestation. Children living in poor, overcrowded areas are more likely to develop scabies.[14] The lower frequency for the same noted by us could be attributed to the better infant care in the state, which in turn, could be a reflection of the high female literacy rate.[15]

Viral infections predominated in a study (18.2%) from Kuwait by Nanda et al., while an Egyptian study documented a higher frequency of bacterial infections (23.4%).[16,17]

The frequency of fungal infection (11.9%) in the current study was slightly higher than the same documented in previous Indian studies (4.6–9.1%).[5,12,18] This could be attributed to the hot and humid climate of the region which provides a favorable environment for fungal infections. It could also be a reflection of the rising trend of fungal infections reported in adults.[19,20] The children may be affected by transmission of infection from their adult care takers. To validate such an epidemiological shift in the incidence of fungal infections in the pediatric community, further studies are needed. Pityriasis versicolor (6.7%) and dermatophytosis (4.4%) as the most common fungal infections noted by us was somewhat comparable to the observations of Samanta and Achar, who noted dermatophytosis, candidiasis, and pityriasis versicolor as the predominant infections of fungal etiology.[5] We made a diagnosis of candidal intertrigo only when hyphae/pseudohyphae were observed in KOH smear. This could be the reason for the low frequency (0.7%) of the same noted among study participants as KOH smear does not show 100% sensitivity to diagnose candidiasis.[21]

Our observation of inflammatory dermatoses (30.7%) as the second most common category after infections and infestations was consistent with previous Indian studies.[5,12,18] Atopic dermatitis being the most common inflammatory dermatosis as observed by us was consistent with foreign literature, while Indian studies have reported inflammatory seborrheic dermatitis as the predominant inflammatory dermatosis.[5,12,18,22,23] Increasing urbanization is cited as the reason for the rising trend of atopic dermatitis observed in developing countries.[24] The frequency of atopic dermatitis (8.5%) noted by us was higher than the same in other Indian studies (4–5%).[5,12] Urbanization, that is taking place at a rapid pace in Kerala could be the reason for the higher frequency of atopic dermatitis in our study.[25]

The frequency of infantile seborrheic dermatitis noted by us was slightly lower than the 10-15% noted in previous Indian studies.[5,12,18] All those manifesting infantile seborrheic dermatitis belonging to the post-neonatal age group as observed by us was discordant to the findings of another study that noted an equal distribution of the disease in neonatal and post-neonatal period.[5]

The prevalence of contact dermatitis (0.4%) documented by us was consistent with literature.[12,26] The offender identified was turmeric in our patient. Previous authors have noted turmeric as an agent causing contact dermatitis.[26] Smearing turmeric on baby skin before giving them a bath is a common cultural practice in the state.

We found a higher frequency of transient neonatal pustular melanosis in comparison to existing literature.[27-32] The frequency of erythema toxicum neonatorum (1.1%) noted by us was lower than the 19–38% reported earlier.[28-30] A greater familiarity among clinicians regarding the condition could be the reason for the low frequency of the same noted in a study conducted in the outpatient clinic of a tertiary referral center, since only referred patients are seen in our outpatient clinics.

The frequency of 2.2% noted for Mongolian spot was lower than the same reported in previous Indian studies (65–90%).[5,29,30,32] Different studies have documented considerable inter-racial difference in the prevalence of Mongolian spot (80– 90% in Asians, and 3–10% in Caucasians).[32-35] The low frequency of Mongolian spot documented by us could be attributed to the patient profile seeking treatment in the dermatology outpatient clinic of a referral hospital. Mongolian spot is a very common condition. Most of the parents (being aware of this birthmark) are less likely to visit a referral hospital solely for the same. Most of the infants with Mongolian spots had come to the institution for other complaints.

Around 2.5% of the sample population had genodermatoses, which was comparable to one previous study (2.1%).[13] However, many other studies reported a lower frequency of patients with genodermatoses.[17] Three neonates were collodion babies (1.1%), which was concordant to the observation of Behera et al., (0.9%).[27] Certain other Indian studies did not report any collodion baby.[5,12,29] Consanguinity, which was noted in all three cases, could be one reason for the higher frequency in our study; moreover, most of the peripheral and rural hospitals refer such babies to a referral center like ours, for better neonatal care.

Papular urticaria reported in 3.3% of infants was comparable to other Indian studies.[5,13,18]

In the sole case (0.4%) of Stevens-Johnson syndrome-Toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS-TEN), the implicated drug was carbamazepine, prescribed for seizure disorder. Techasatian et al., had reported carbamazepine (prescribed for seizure disorder) as the most common drug causing (SJS-TEN) in children.[36]

Limitations

The study carried out in the outpatient clinic of the dermatology department of a tertiary referral center and the cross-sectional design were the major limitations.

CONCLUSION

Infections and infestations were the most common dermatoses in infants (who attended the outpatient clinic of the dermatology department of a tertiary referral center) followed by inflammatory conditions. Fungal infections were the most frequently observed infection. Whether, this indicates an epidemiological shift in the prevalence of dermatophytosis in pediatric age group needs analysis in future studies. Atopic dermatitis was the most common non-infective dermatosis observed in the overall study population as well as in the 1–12 month age group, whereas napkin dermatitis predominated in neonates.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Koyakutty Abdul Samad and Dr. Anuja Elizabeth George are on the editorial board of the Journal.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

References

  1. , , . Common neurocutaneous syndromes. Pediatr Ann. 2015;44:496-504.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. . Cutaneous manifestations in primary immunodeficiency diseases. J Skin Sex Transm Dis. 2021;3:143-50.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . The skin as an early expression of malignancies in the neonatal age: A review of the literature and a case series. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:809406.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , . Patterns of infant dermatoses-a cross sectional study in a tertiary care centre. Ann Int Med Dent Res. 2017;3:DT04-7.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Available from: https://www.who.int/westernpacific/health-topics/newborn-health [Last accessed on 2022 Jan 12]
  6. , , , , , , et al. Preterm birth: Case definition and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunisation safety data. Vaccine. 2016;34:6047-56.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Skin physiology of the neonate and infant: Clinical implications. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2015;4:587-95.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . Barrier function and water-holding and transport properties of infant stratum corneum are different from adult and continue to develop through the first year of life. J Invest Dermatol. 2008;128:1728-36.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , et al. Complex assessment of age-specific morphofunctional features of skin of different anatomic localizations. Skin Res Technol. 2013;19:e85-92.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. New born skin: Common skin problems. Maedica (Bucur). 2017;12:42-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , . A clinico-etiological study of dermatoses in pediatric age group in tertiary health care center in South Gujarat region. Indian J Dermatol. 2015;60:635.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Pattern of pediatric dermatoses in a referral center in South India. Indian Pediatr. 2004;41:373-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , . Scabies in the developing world-its prevalence, complications, and management. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:313-23.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. . Female literacy and economic development in India. Rupkatha J Interdiscip Stud. 2016;8:64-70.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , . A prospective survey of pediatric dermatology clinic patients in Kuwait: An analysis of 10,000 cases. Pediatr Dermatol. 1999;16:6-11.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , . Prevalence of skin diseases among infants and children in Al Sharqia Governorate, Egypt. Egypt J Dermatol Online J. 2012;8:1.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , et al. The spectrum of skin disease among Indian children. Pediatr Dermatol. 2009;26:6-13.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , et al. The unprecedented epidemic-like scenario of dermatophytosis in India: I. Epidemiology, risk factors and clinical features. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2021;87:154-75.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , et al. The current Indian epidemic of superficial dermatophytosis due to Trichophyton mentagrophytes: A molecular study. Mycoses. 2019;62:336-56.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , . Fluorescence staining vs. routine KOH smear for rapid diagnosis of oral candidiasis-a diagnostic test. Oral Dis. 2020;26:941-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , . Prevalence of skin diseases among pediatric patients in Turkey. J Dermatol. 2008;35:413-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , . Epidemiology of pediatric dermatology and allergology in the region of Aargau, Switzerland. Pediatr Dermatol. 2003;20:482-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , . Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of atopic dermatitis in the developing countries of Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East: A review. Dermatol Ther. 2019;9:685-705.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. . Cultural dermatoses: Turmeric allergy (mangalsutra dermatitis and kumkum dermatitis)-a case report. J Skin Sex Transm Dis. 2020;2:49-51.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , . Study of physiological and pathological skin changes in neonates: An East Indian perspective. Indian J Paediatr Dermatol. 2018;19:40-7.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , . Early neonatal dermatoses: A study among 1260 babies delivered at a tertiary care center in South India. Indian J Paediatr Dermatol. 2016;17:190-195.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , . Dermatoses in Indian neonates: A clinical study. Egypt J Dermatol Venerol. 2014;34:86-92.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. , . A cross-sectional prospective study of cutaneous lesions in newborn. ISRN Dermatol. 2014;2014:360590.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , , . Survey of cutaneous findings in newborns in Saudi Arabia. J Dermatol Dermatol Surg. 2017;21:53-7.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , . Clinicoepidemiological study of cutaneous manifestations in the neonate. Indian J Dermatol Venerol Leprol. 2000;66:26-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , , , et al. A study on neonatal dermatosis. J Community Med Health Educ. 2012;2:169.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , . Prevalence of dermatoses in the neonates in Pondicherry. Indian J Dermatol Venerol Leprol. 1991;57:25-28.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. , . Mongolian spots: How important are they? World J Clin Cases. 2013;1:230-2.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , . Drug-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in children: 20-year study in a tertiary care hospital. World J Pediatr. 2017;13:255-60.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections